I would rather see her videos over Satchmo's every day of the week.
I would rather see her videos over Satchmo's every day of the week.
i agree, this should be a defensive tune up game. odds are the offense wont get much going considering the injuries and fbs talent. if our defense can hang strong and make some good plays throughout 4 quarters it can be seen as a small winThe elephant in the room is getting out of this game healthy. The only way you could see us being successful on offense (based on our current personnel and how we are "built") is a bunch of QB runs. I know Wickersham is a big guy but that's a recipe for disaster and potential injury when facing a FBS defense, especially with our inexperienced OL. My fear is a bunch of 3 and outs that puts our defense on the field for long stretches and then we start seeing attrition on our DL which is our best unit. I hope we get after them on Saturday and make it a 4 quarter game.
I thought the same thing. In my brief viewing of the end of the Wofford game, I saw a number of guys that looked hobbled to a degree and that adds to the concern. UNC is definitely not a great team, but should have enough to overpower the Spiders.The elephant in the room is getting out of this game healthy.
I believe it was Huesman who took it even further. Unless I’m dreaming, I believe he, or someone, said there was less chance of injury, because you’re competing against better athletes, who possess better technique, reducing the risk of injury.The view often is FCS teams get beat up when playing FBS schools. Not sure there is data to support this. Coach Huesman has repeatedly said it is a non factor, no more of a concern than any other game. Would love to see data supporting one view or the other.
Of course an injury can happen in any game. But if you are playing a team that is significantly bigger than there is no way the team isn’t going to “feel it” more the next day. The FCS schools keep playing the FBS ones so it isn’t a death knell, but the reason they play is for the money and the small chance of a victory. In this case, I think the small chance is even smaller thus no upside.The view often is FCS teams get beat up when playing FBS schools. Not sure there is data to support this. Coach Huesman has repeatedly said it is a non factor, no more of a concern than any other game. Would love to see data supporting one view or the other.
I’d love to see the data as well, would be very interesting. Obviously with the violent nature of football there’s always a chance for injury but when you run a QB (who is more like a fullback, and not elusive) 15-20 times a game I think the risk of injury probably increases with bigger/faster/more powerful defensive players getting hits on him. Hopefully it’s just worry on my part and we come out of this game healthy and put up a good showing.The view often is FCS teams get beat up when playing FBS schools. Not sure there is data to support this. Coach Huesman has repeatedly said it is a non factor, no more of a concern than any other game. Would love to see data supporting one view or the other.
I was there and watched Nixon chase Famous Amos Lawrence from behind.![]()
Richmond embarrasses Tar Heels
Clipping found in The Charlotte Observer published in Charlotte, North Carolina on 11/5/1978. Richmond embarrasses Tar Heelswww.newspapers.com
That game was played at City Stadium in front of 16,000.
thanks for posting this newspaper story...its amazing how my mind tends to embellish things that happened nearly 50 years ago now...but it's fun until you get called out!...it's the stuff war stories are made of!I was there and watched Nixon chase Famous Amos Lawrence from behind.
You are correct I heard the same interview.I believe it was Huesman who took it even further. Unless I’m dreaming, I believe he, or someone, said there was less chance of injury, because you’re competing against better athletes, who possess better technique, reducing the risk of injury.
Of course there was no data to back up this opinion either!
Go Spiders!