agreed that we can't take much from this game. it's basically another scrimmage, with the benefit of getting everyone on the floor in a game that "counts".
1) defense worked hard, though no idea if effective against a D1 team. SV certainly couldn't handle it. Saturday will show us much more.
2) the press ... fine that we got to work on it. hate that we had to resort to it against a team like this. our halfcourt offense was so bad that we had to press to create anything.
3) could have just fed Walz, Beagle, Daughtry, etc inside all night, but what would be the point.
4) as many have pointed out, AA is the real deal. moves a lot like a freshman Gilly, and creates like him. not just a scorer. I'm one of the few remaining believers in Tyne, but while I think Tyne will score more this year he's not the creator that AA will be. Tyne's a small 2-guard more than a true PG. I'll give Johnston more time to show what he is, but I could see a backcourt of AA and Tyne.
5) need more time from Lopez and Thomas and Johnston to formulate an opinion.
6) Beagle is very good. with Walz' ability to shoot the 3, you could absollutely play them together. but we won't.
7) I was ready to annoint McG after that 1st three, then he missed the next 2. need to see more, but I'm leaning towards believing. that's a good looking stroke.
8) JRob is for real. he will make things happen. not a shooter but we assumed that. he's got to get substantial playing time at the 4. I'd like an even split with him and Daughtry.
9) so I think we're strong at the 5 and will be strong at the 4 once Mooney scraps this starting lineup. our guards should be good. it'll be most interesting to see what shakes out at the 3 between Tanner, AP, AJ and McG. could even play Daughtry there when we realize JRob needs more playing time. I assume it's Tanner's job to lose.
1) defense worked hard, though no idea if effective against a D1 team. SV certainly couldn't handle it. Saturday will show us much more.
2) the press ... fine that we got to work on it. hate that we had to resort to it against a team like this. our halfcourt offense was so bad that we had to press to create anything.
3) could have just fed Walz, Beagle, Daughtry, etc inside all night, but what would be the point.
4) as many have pointed out, AA is the real deal. moves a lot like a freshman Gilly, and creates like him. not just a scorer. I'm one of the few remaining believers in Tyne, but while I think Tyne will score more this year he's not the creator that AA will be. Tyne's a small 2-guard more than a true PG. I'll give Johnston more time to show what he is, but I could see a backcourt of AA and Tyne.
5) need more time from Lopez and Thomas and Johnston to formulate an opinion.
6) Beagle is very good. with Walz' ability to shoot the 3, you could absollutely play them together. but we won't.
7) I was ready to annoint McG after that 1st three, then he missed the next 2. need to see more, but I'm leaning towards believing. that's a good looking stroke.
8) JRob is for real. he will make things happen. not a shooter but we assumed that. he's got to get substantial playing time at the 4. I'd like an even split with him and Daughtry.
9) so I think we're strong at the 5 and will be strong at the 4 once Mooney scraps this starting lineup. our guards should be good. it'll be most interesting to see what shakes out at the 3 between Tanner, AP, AJ and McG. could even play Daughtry there when we realize JRob needs more playing time. I assume it's Tanner's job to lose.