Fire Mooney

I don't know how Mooney says some of this sh*t with a straight face. As Brook points out, our switching defense has been exploited all the way back 15 plus years ago by St. Mary's. And here is Mooney pontificating on how we need to address it in 2025. If he is here another 5 years, he will make the very same statement in 2031 too and JOC will probably write the same damn article about it.

The other funny thing is JOC didn’t even ask the question. It was someone else. I think Lane Casadonte tv guy. JOC didn’t think to ask that in 21 years? It’s been going on that long. Light bulb goes off in his head after he hears the question like oh maybe I should write about it.
 
More on the article by JOC.

“We switch an awful lot and it can put you in a difficult situation,” Mooney said of the UR defensive tactic during which the defender guarding the screener picks up the man for whom the screen is set. “The positive of switching, you might take way the edge of the ballhandler and take away some other things.”

Richmond’s defensive philosophy can play out with the Spiders switching and preventing an opposing guard from driving directly to the basket, which causes extensive chaos, because a Spider is waiting to stop that offensive player as he comes off a screen.

The offensive player can’t penetrate UR resistance for a layup, or draw interior defensive help, freeing an opposing big man for a pass that leads to a layup.

Richmond’s defensive philosophy can also play out with Argabright, a 5-foot-11 Spiders freshman, trying to hold off 6-8, 220-pound VCU junior Michael Belle three feet from the basket in a mission-nearly-impossible assignment. UR opponents seem to regularly unlock those desirable matchups.....

Richmond’s staff assessment of cost-benefit associated with switching on screens has led Spiders' coaches to believe it’s a sound defensive system. Mooney was hired by Richmond in 2005 and his first teams featured tall guards, all in the 6-4 range, to go with taller forwards and centers. Part of the advantage to being tall in the backcourt, he explained, was the ability to switch on screens and not get overpowered when opponents’ big men were covered by UR guards....

Richmond defeated St. Bonaventure 99-94 last Saturday at the Robins Center. Frank Mitchell, the Bonnies’ 6-8, 270-pound senior, made 8 of 9 inside shots and scored 16. He also committed 5 turnovers as Richmond guards forced to cover him via switching raked the ball from his grasp for some of them.


 
"The positive is you can take away the edge, the ball handler, and other things".

1. When have we consistently taken away the edge?
2. When have we taken away the ball handler?
3. What other things have we taken away?
4. Even if we did take away these things, and we don't, why would this be a positive if it leads to them easily scoring at the basket every time?
They've taken away my enthusiasm for Spider basketball and made me a big lacrosse fan. I'm so tired of Mooney that I just don't care anymore.
 
I watch teams that play the screen properly by hedging the ball carrier and allowing covering guard to cover
while 90% of the time the hedger gets back on the roll, successfully. We just don’t hedge the screener well at all.
There is no excuse to not performing that level of defense unless you do not believe you can do it or you don’t have
the right personnel.
 
Back
Top