Especially when they do not rebound, nobody makes all their shots.Sometimes good offense can make up for or at least equalize bad defense. I agree that the team lost because of horrific defense, but I also think watching an offense that has five guys outside the three point line for 90 percent of the time means no offensive rebounds, no three point plays on drives, no chance to get the other team in foul trouble like they did to us, etc. We lost by five points. I can't believe just moving Walz iunder the basket ten more times wouldn't have created some of what I mentioned above. We wont beat good teams with a terrible defense but we could beat bad teams more than we have so far. I admit that Walz has almost no inside game anymore because the Moon man seems to think that having NO ONE under the basket isn't really a problem. This offense seemed to stress threes, now it seems to require threes. Unfortunately almost no one wins constantly like that.
If he knew what he was doing we wouldn’t be in this situation after 20 plus years. We are hanging out in the basement of A10. Of course he knows what he’s doing even though everything we see says “not”.
Watch this interview--at least the Mooney part. Good interview, and seems like he knows what we need to do to fix things. you listen to this and you realize he knows what he's doing.
What I appreciate is he has command on what needs to be fixed but also mentions how proud he is of the effort.
95% of the folks on this forum know how to fix it.If he knew what he was doing we wouldn’t be in this situation after 20 plus years. We are hanging out in the basement of A10. Of course he knows what he’s doing even though everything we see says “not”.
And after all this, the guy that created this is going to fix it. Copy that.
I admire you propping up the coach, Will. But I disagree with your points.
Don't believe it. It's ai
Watch this interview--at least the Mooney part. Good interview, and seems like he knows what we need to do to fix things. you listen to this and you realize he knows what he's doing.
What I appreciate is he has command on what needs to be fixed but also mentions how proud he is of the effort.
I think most serious fans could have said what he did.
Watch this interview--at least the Mooney part. Good interview, and seems like he knows what we need to do to fix things. you listen to this and you realize he knows what he's doing.
What I appreciate is he has command on what needs to be fixed but also mentions how proud he is of the effort.
Respectfully, disagree. There isn’t one substantial comment made in there as to what we need to fix. I heard “defend without fouling” and “reduce turnovers”. I certainly didn’t hear a plan to fix either of those things. Play softer on D? Stop trying to thread the needle on low percentage pass plays which we do all the time?
Watch this interview--at least the Mooney part. Good interview, and seems like he knows what we need to do to fix things. you listen to this and you realize he knows what he's doing.
What I appreciate is he has command on what needs to be fixed but also mentions how proud he is of the effort.
does he know? We are on a 6 game losing streak with no end of that in sight. If he knew how to "fix" things it would've happened by now.
Watch this interview--at least the Mooney part. Good interview, and seems like he knows what we need to do to fix things. you listen to this and you realize he knows what he's doing.
What I appreciate is he has command on what needs to be fixed but also mentions how proud he is of the effort.
I found it ironic that they made Robinson player of the game for the Davidson game had him on for the coaches show on Monday night talking about this increased play and performance and than Mooney turns right around and plays him 5 frickin minutes the next game.I argued with someone who said you can't play both man and zone well ... it's one or the other. could be he was right. though we don't play either well. but that 2-3 zone we've throw together after not working on it at all in the weak OOC is the worst 2-3 I've seen. we run our 2-3 like a 6th grade travel team. there are holes everywhere. no problem getting the ball to the high post. and from there it's easy pickings. never seen teams get dunks against a 2-3.
also, this tiny lineup is driving me crazy. we're playing 4 guys who weight like 180 lbs and we wonder why we get bullied. size matters. our defense apparently will suck no matter who plays, so please play Daughtry more than 11 minutes. at least he's aggressive offensively and goes towards the basket. or play AP. or Jaylen. somebody with some size.
And don't forget non athletic. So, other than slow, small, not quick, and non athletic.....We need more length at guard for sure. Im good with one small guard which we have assuming AA stays. The roster construction is bad. We look like a low major team in terms of size at most spots. We are also not a quick team. Slow and small is a bad recipe in the A10.
So you are saying if I attended now, I could play?And don't forget non athletic. So, other than slow, small, not quick, and non athletic.....