sman
All A-10 player
that's fine. let them go. but you're going to spend more to replace them.Why? None of our guys other than AA are worth close to 100k.
I'd rather keep them (hopefully for less) and spend elsewhere.
that's fine. let them go. but you're going to spend more to replace them.Why? None of our guys other than AA are worth close to 100k.
I get it. you're unhappy. but it was our best press conference. it was well done.Long clip....short clip...it's all the same....YAWN!!!!!!
As if I am the only one unhappy? What is there to be happy about? AA returning is great, but my goodness, we return no one else of significance, we went 5-14 in the A-10 the past 2 seasons, we have a coach who acts like everything is just fine and business as usual, and an AD who releases a ridiculous statement saying Mooney will return without talking about expectations or anything else fans would want and expect to hear. So, sorry, it takes a lot more than another unemotional Mooney press conference to get me excited.I get it. you're unhappy. but it was our best press conference. it was well done.
Prob true but if we’re just going to replace them with equivalents who do cost us 100k, we are better off keeping the equivalents for a lower price.Why? None of our guys other than AA are worth close to 100k.
A very good interview that talks about our existing players? Serious question to you.....what on earth could we learn about our existing players that we do not already know? More time to talk to our current roster? About what? "Hey, guys, you can stay if you want, but we went 5-14 in the A-10 the last 2 years, so we are looking to replace you in the portal". How long does that take? But, seriously, why would we need any time to figure out we need a whole new roster minus AA if we want to be a top A-10 team?this was a shorter clip of the longer (very good) interview posted last week. he's talking about our existing players. there's a longer break this year before the portal opens. it gives them more time to talk to the current roster and work things out.
First of all, we shouldn't replace them with equivalents. That makes no sense at all. Secondly, if we miss on enough we need to complete the roster with close to equivalents, I would absolutely take a chance on newer "similar" guys because the new and unknowns might surprise us, and we already know what we have in the knowns.Prob true but if we’re just going to replace them with equivalents who do cost us 100k, we are better off keeping the equivalents for a lower price.
Lots of ifs in this statement/thesis.
I understand that, I’m just saying you probably can get a JRob or Harper at a more reasonable price than a portal rental.First of all, we shouldn't replace them with equivalents. That makes no sense at all. Secondly, if we miss on enough we need to complete the roster with close to equivalents, I would absolutely take a chance on newer "similar" guys because the new and unknowns might surprise us, and we already know what we have in the knowns.
did you watch the full press conference?A very good interview that talks about our existing players? Serious question to you.....what on earth could we learn about our existing players that we do not already know? More time to talk to our current roster? About what? "Hey, guys, you can stay if you want, but we went 5-14 in the A-10 the last 2 years, so we are looking to replace you in the portal". How long does that take? But, seriously, why would we need any time to figure out we need a whole new roster minus AA if we want to be a top A-10 team?
No. Fill me in. What did I miss? I know you are a lot more excited about our returning guys than I am, so maybe that is causing our disagreement.did you watch the full press conference?