2026-27 roster needs

so we're fabricating a world where losing keeps Mooney here?
fact is that while it may not seem to take much, he historically does need a winning season to get an extension.
If a winning season is all that’s needed to give an extension then give Mooney a lifetime contract now and move to division 3. Just stop the facade of playing high level division 1 basketball.

In all seriousness, he obviously won’t get contract extensions for losing but I would not be surprised at all to see our administration give him the remaining 3 years of his contract and not terminating earlier regardless of the record.
 
jeez. I didn't mean "winning season" like over .500
I believe he's only gotten extensions after really good seasons. maybe I'm wrong.
 
If a winning season is all that’s needed to give an extension then give Mooney a lifetime contract now and move to division 3. Just stop the facade of playing high level division 1 basketball.

In all seriousness, he obviously won’t get contract extensions for losing but I would not be surprised at all to see our administration give him the remaining 3 years of his contract and not terminating earlier regardless of the record.
I’d say your 2nd paragraph is a given. He’ll be here next November to coach in opening game vs a D2 or D3 game.
 
Does JOC just lay out articles as excuse generating articles for Mooney? They all go like this: Hey Chris, have you ever considered or what are your thoughts on X (i.e recruiting from Europe, playing a Big East-A-10 challenge are the 2 flavors this week). You know John, that is a good question, I think that is definitely something we should explore in the future. College basketball just is changing so fast, it is hard to keep up these days, but this is something we should explore.

Constantly baffled how Mooney never gets asked about the g*d damn dumpster fire of the current season we are in whilst we are in the midst of that season. I mean who really gives a sh*t what Mooney's random thoughts are on an A-10 Big East challenge in the middle of the season. Mooney of course loves these questions because the more he talks about this nonsense, the less he has to talk about the results of his damn job which he is failing at miserable.

So done with EVERYTHING about our MBB program.
 
Does JOC just lay out articles as excuse generating articles for Mooney?
Yes. That was made abundantly clear this year. JOC posted an article about scheduling challenges in the summer before our schedule was released. He posted about difficulty competing with NIL before Queally’s post of being materially outspent and then a more formal article that followed.

I would not be surprised at all if they just tell him what to ask and write about.
 
Yes. That was made abundantly clear this year. JOC posted an article about scheduling challenges in the summer before our schedule was released. He posted about difficulty competing with NIL before Queally’s post of being materially outspent and then a more formal article that followed.

I would not be surprised at all if they just tell him what to ask and write about.
The strange timing of these latest articles sure does make it seem like it is planned and they are all in together on the excuses. Most coaches, like maybe 99% of them, would give a quick answer to these random mid season questions about scheduling and NIL and then move on to talking about this year's team and the next game. But, Mooney spends probably 30 minutes answering these while not mentioning anything about our next game.
 
The strange timing of these latest articles sure does make it seem like it is planned and they are all in together on the excuses. Most coaches, like maybe 99% of them, would give a quick answer to these random mid season questions about scheduling and NIL and then move on to talking about this year's team and the next game. But, Mooney spends probably 30 minutes answering these while not mentioning anything about our next game.
Sure feels that way. I remember JOC having cryptic tweets/articles before our move to the Patriot League for football too. Definitely comes across as our administration giving the information to JOC on what to say/write rather than JOC asking questions he thinks the public - in this case spider fans - would want to know the answers to, which in my opinion is what the job of a journalist who works independent of the university should do.

My biggest issue with the articles aren’t what they’re saying but the timing of it. I thought the article on NIL was at least informative and presented me with information I did not know before which was NIL donors have given us $2 million. I think potential scheduling alliance discussions with the Big East or other conferences are important too. Same thing with expanding our recruiting presence in Europe. However, those are all off season kinds of questions. Not the kind of questions I would ask after we lost to VCU at home, lost to them 7 out of the last 8 times, lost 6 out of our last 7 games, and are bottom 4 in the A10 for the 3rd time in 4 years. Asking those other questions now comes across as ignoring the giant elephant in the room.

I don’t know why he doesn’t want to bring those things up. There are certainly respectful ways to do it. No one is asking him to be a bring it up in a mean-spirited way, have a negative connotation to it, or give leading questions. Presenting the information objectively and allowing Mooney the opportunity to provide an open-ended response sharing his thoughts on what has transpired and ways we are moving forward, certainly seems reasonable and more pertinent at this time.
 
Last edited:
I thought the article on NIL was at least informative and presented me with information I did not know before which was NIL donors have given us $2 million.
I think the $2M number is the total NIL budget including the school's contribution ... not just the donors.
hopefully the school component is increasing this year.
 
These fluff articles are all Moon will address. I doubt he’d go much on record with the real failings of his own choices and decision making. Also, it’s not like he can talk about post season play because we were eliminated weeks ago AGAIN like last year.
 
I think the $2M number is the total NIL budget including the school's contribution ... not just the donors.
hopefully the school component is increasing this year.

agree. and we took that all in house didn't we? not that we don't want donor contributions of course we do.

But screw that 2M figure. 2M is accurate because JOC printed what sources say like newspapers r never wrong and the ppl sourcing the info don't have different motives?. nah. don't cry poor, we know U of R is not poor. Show some real data starting with Moon specific contract details & then u can start gaining some credibility back.
 
I think the $2M number is the total NIL budget including the school's contribution ... not just the donors.
hopefully the school component is increasing this year.
If that’s the case, as a university we have to be contributing more to that. We can’t be talking the talk about the importance athletics has for our university/community which to Hallock’s credit has mentioned a few times and also basketball being our flagship sport, and not commit more. The way I see it is there are 2 separate points here. Mooney should not be complaining about only having a $2 million roster with the results that he is producing as if the lack of money is to blame. The other point is that if we are serious about basketball as a school then we need to be giving closer to $4 million/yr at least, total through NIL and school contributions. We want to be in the same group as Saint Louis, Dayton, and VCU. Not Fordham and La Salle.
 
I continue to find it laughable that our performance is being blamed on money. Does money matter? Of course it does.

But does anyone think money is why we lost to Charlie southpaw, furryman or elongated u? No. We lost those games because of system, gameplan, lack of gameplan, effort, execution, perhaps all of he above.

This isn’t the most talented team to take the floor at UR but they aren’t untalented. But there’s a bunch of shit that’s off.

It’s way past time for a change. Any change for the love of god.
 
Even something like "can be really good" is a bridge he doesn't like to approach without serious qualifiers. He usually catches himself and changes his wording to something like we have a chance to be really good?.

He never says direct statements like "We're really good." or "I expect great things" - I think I've only ever heard that from players.

I have a chance to win the lottery. Richmond under Moon has a chance to be really good.

Leafy.
 
Yep. This is part of the reason I was hyping/hopeful on Bryson pre season. Felt if he could be that stud wing that would pull things together and make us have legit talent. Of course that was predicated on Walz showing up more than 1 out of 4 games and a bunch of production from some oherr guys that have disappeared in A10 play.
No one is asking why haven’t we played this kid??!!
 
Back
Top