Probably me, but the debate was Sman saying we will recruit in a way to always have a 3rd big, while I countered with examples of us in certain years where we did not have a 3rd big.
Should we always have one? Even after losing both last night, I can't say yes because who would our 3rd big even be? It's not like a 3rd, rotation worthy big would be happy here backing up a couple guys and only playing if they get hurt. I would say there are very few programs out there who carry 3 bigs on their roster and could just put a decent big in there if they lose a couple bigs to injury like we did.
So, my point was don't get a 3rd big just to have a big, get a player who can help us, regardless of position. And. this year, we actually do have a 3rd big who is redshirting, so even though we have a 3rd big, we are better off going small than playing our 3rd big.
Soulis transferred because he was behind 2 guys, which backs up my point that it is hard to have 3 bigs on the roster since there are only 40 mpg to go around at that position.