Spider17
Starter
When did I say that? Shouldn’t Hardt wait until the end of this season before fully re-evaluating our program and what the next steps should be?There will be no re-evaluation after this season as 17 seems to indicate.
When did I say that? Shouldn’t Hardt wait until the end of this season before fully re-evaluating our program and what the next steps should be?There will be no re-evaluation after this season as 17 seems to indicate.
We can’t as fans both complain that we aren’t making enough NCAA tournaments and when we do make an NCAA tournament (and win a game) devalue that by saying it was done by catching light in a bottle. It goes both ways. We made the tournament and Mooney should get credit for that. Same way if we didn’t that year with that class, that would’ve probably been the final straw.I think Hardt has faced the same conditions wirh CM that two other ADs (let that sink in) faced before him. CM is just good enough to make it hard to move on.
You mention the five year stretch and wonder why folks can’t acknowledge the merit of that. You see it as five good years I gather. I saw one great year cut short by Covid, another year that ended up being awesome but only because we got a little lightning in the bottle at the A10 tournament after an underwhelming regular season, and a third season where we kind of miraculously strung something together to win the conference title while having zero at large chance of making the ncaa tournament. These were sandwiched around another weird underperforming season and a losing season.
It’s hard for me to see any consistent upward trajectory in there. This is a 20+ year pattern, I can of course see this season out but there’s very little coming that I don’t feel like I’ve seen before.
Conversely, Hardt seems to have made a great hire in Roussell, why we wouldn’t want something similar for MBB is baffling.
Until they cut down the nets.Also, many seem to want to diminish the A10 regular season championship but I think that was definitely a successful season.
Can’t fault the guys for wanting to celebrate a great achievement with the home fans, but ya bad look to then lay 3 consecutive eggs in a row afterwards.Until they cut down the nets.
Ftr, I’m not diminishing the ncaa year, it is what it is and I was super pleased with their effort. Perhaps lightning in a bottle is poor word choice. I think what it goes to show though is there’s an inability to drive success. That team was by all accounts loaded with talent and experience and we finished 6th in conference. So I’m looking at the five year run and see no consistency or trajectory.We can’t as fans both complain that we aren’t making enough NCAA tournaments and when we do make an NCAA tournament (and win a game) devalue that by saying it was done by catching light in a bottle. It goes both ways. We made the tournament and Mooney should get credit for that. Same way if we didn’t that year with that class, that would’ve probably been the final straw.
As far as your point about varying years where one year we won the A10 tournament, the next year we stunk, and the following year we won A10 regular season, I agree (think we agree here?) that those are not signs of building a program with sustained success. But sometimes, the ends justify the means and we got the good results. It’s almost like having a friend constantly gamble to make money, but is winning enough so you can’t criticize it even if you know that’s not the best way to go about it.
Right now, Mooney’s Jordan King luck of getting good transfers who come in and make instant impact seems to be running out and he is not showing me other ways of sustaining a winning program. It’s quite the contrary actually with how many players we’ve had leave the programs over the years who weren’t A10 or lower mid major caliber players. There’s nothing to suggest about building off of core players like we did with 2018-2019. Every year, we as fans will have no idea what to expect and instead hope that Mooney and staff do well with the portal, which has not seemed the case up to this point, but we should all wait to give our final judgement on this year’s team when the season ends.
Also, many seem to want to diminish the A10 regular season championship but I think that was definitely a successful season.
We aren’t going anywhere this year. St.Louis, George Mason and VCU are in the way. George Washington is likely to make the NIT this year. I see us playing a pointless CBI or some tournament lower than NITFtr, I’m not diminishing the ncaa year, it is what it is and I was super pleased with their effort. Perhaps lightning in a bottle is poor word choice. I think what it goes to show though is there’s an inability to drive success. That team was by all accounts loaded talent and experience an we finished 6th in conference. So I’m looking at the rice year run and see no consistency or trajectory.
At some point UR made the decision long ago that it wasn’t going to fire a coach barring dreadful performance or some kind of bad behavior threshold. So I don’t see any change forthcoming.
or no postseason at allWe aren’t going anywhere this year. St.Louis, George Mason and VCU are in the way. George Washington is likely to make the NIT this year. I see us playing a pointless CBI or some tournament lower than NIT
I think Harper might be a guy. it's tougher today to get time as a freshman with the 15 man roster and all the upper class transfers joining and filling spots, but Harper's getting more time already and looks good out there.Only Daughtry, a transfer, and Aiden, a recruit, are juniors or younger who compare to the 6 guys above. So, there is your difference right there. The portal can help and it needs to help big time, but right after this year, we will have 2 guys, not 6, that we feel real good about. That is a dramatic difference.
Nice to see another freshman get some minutes. If he is good and better than what we have, play him more!!! We know what we have with Tyne and Tanner. We should recruit well enough to have a freshman better than them right now as a true freshman. Hopefully, Harper is that guy.I think Harper might be a guy. it's tougher today to get time as a freshman with the 15 man roster and all the upper class transfers joining and filling spots, but Harper's getting more time already and looks good out there.
Exactly what I was saying to a few other richmond fans. He is going to have to be the alpha.He has got to have Johnston getting 10-15 shots every game and hunting shots like King. Not as talented as King, but closest we have this year.
Agree. Have said this from day 1. We need him to score.Exactly what I was saying to a few other richmond fans. He is going to have to be the alpha.
historically, yes. But specifically, if a team either game plans against a guy, or throws a curveball - that's on Moon to adjust. Not his strong suit by a mile.agreed with Johnston.
I don't remember why he didn't get shots up for a couple games, but I put that more on him than Mooney.
Mooney doesn't run plays for guys much. I know many of you have issues with that, but our offense historically provides plenty of opportunities for our best players to get shots. Johnston has to be assertive. he has been the past two games.
I felt Fordham was working hard to limit Johnston ... and couldn't. when he's aggressive he gets shots up.Sometimes you need to stop taking what they are purposefully giving you, and take a shot that you want, by the guy you want shooting. Get a guy open via a unique set, draw something up, or simply just adjust.
Agreed, except for I'm not sure who I'd drop us below. There's some not so great teams below us on those rankings.staying at 7th - sort of expected us to drop a bit from the last rankings 2 weeks ago realizing this is fairly subjective based on which teams to voters are actually watching.