These guys understand the importance of a successful program

Arachnid

Walk-on
What’s UR’s understanding?


"When your name is called on Selection Sunday on CBS, and there are 200 million people watching the NCAA basketball tournament, then that puts a spotlight on your campus," he said. "So then it allows you to do the things like talk about how great things are in the Massey Cancer Center, our School of Engineering, the Children's Hospital of Richmond.

"It shines the light on all those other things, but it's critically important to have a sports program."
Ed M
 
UR is casting a more focused net. The target audience is females and lacrosse players from the NorthEast. (/s as well as true).
 
To be fair, Hallock and Hardt have made similar statements like these in the past. I do believe UR understands the importance of athletics in raising the overall school profile, the question is what are we willing to do to achieve that. For instance on women’s side, paying Roussell the P4 level money to stay here and the NIL/House Settlement money to continue/build his success. On men’s side, same thing with money and if we have another really bad year, look at coaching changes.

Hallock article on Value of sports:


Here’s a quote from the article above of us opting in to house settlement.

“A successful Division I Athletics program has been an important part of the Richmond experience for decades,” said University of Richmond President Kevin F. Hallock. “Athletics brings generations of Spiders together, strengthens our ties with the surrounding region, and offers a platform to showcase our remarkable university on a national stage.”
 
17, problem is the talk is empty on our side. Mooney had the one miracle run (after underacheiving regular season) to get to NCAAs. Other than that has been very mediocre and zero pressure, or thought of change.
 
Good point @Spider17, but the words are easier than action.

The athletics program is fairing well overall, but the “pillar” (Men’s basketball) is once again on the downswing. There is no doubt that there is some good news on the athletics front. Just as true is the fact that the basketball program has not been meeting expectations at least if one compares the 2 programs in Richmond. It isn’t even close. Both had great success in 2011. One program built on the success. The other didn’t.
 
23 and RichmondNative, I completely get where you’re coming from. Seeing the success of the women’s team in only 7 years under Roussell dispels the narrative that Richmond can’t be a premier program.

from 2020-2024 we had some great results and something Mooney and staff should absolutely get credit for. The issue I’m having with the men’s program now is, questioning whether we can have sustained success. I think we can all agree that our schedule stinks. Seeing us schedule such a bad OOC made me a bit more pessimistic about our team’s mentality going into the season and whether we want to build a program to have sustained success or just to save face. So I get where many of you are coming from when we look at the juxtaposition between our women’s program who is only getting better and our men’s program where our results have been all over the place the past few years. Here’s the men’s record below:

2021-2022 - we won A10 tourney
2022-2023 - went 13-14 and finished 11th in A10
2023-2024 - finished 1st A10 regular season
2024-2025 - went 10-22 and 13th in A10

It has been a roller coaster of emotions the past few years and I do think a sign of a good program, not just team, is some level of sustained success every year. Are there down years? Of course. But a down year shouldn’t be going from 1st to 13th. Just look at our women’s team who have a much higher floor and ceiling and this has been sustained in such a short turn around by Roussell.

But not to deviate too much from the essence of this post, which is that UR has repeatedly stated the value of athletics and have done a lot of things to show that. The actions I want to see from UR is to not just talk the talk but show it by paying Roussell the P4 money he deserves and give our women’s program the NIL to be a top 25 program. On the men’s side, I want to see us more vocal in advocating for better OOC and call out teams by name if need be. I want to see us have sustained success and not going into every season thinking “are we going to finish 1st or last?”. We need to do better with recruiting and better offense/defense schemes. This is ultimately the coach’s responsibility. If we finish with another bad year this year, then the action I want to see UR having is looking for another coach.

The talk is there and even the walk is there. We just need to walk the walk when it comes to making the hard decision like ponying up the salary for a once in a generation coach or potentially firing a coach (or mutually parting ways) who has been at UR for 20 years if need be.
 
While UR understands this in words and as well as in action with the results of our women's team and men's lacrosse team, for some reason our flagship sport it has an unhealthy allegiance to a coach who has shown over and over again that he can not get the program to where it should and could be. I don't know what all of the reasons are but if I were to list them they would be.

1. Our biggest donor, Queally has Mooney's back
2. We like Mooney setting records due to his longetivity
3. His contract seems large and therefore we would have to eat a bigger chuck of money if were to let him go.
4. Mooney's former players like him and support him
5. Mooney is likeable and represents UR well
 
Back
Top