I still don't see us doing well next year, even with a lot of NIL. When has Mooney ever done well with a bunch of guys 1st year in the system? We need 4 new starters with AA. Anyone else who returns is not going to be a good enough starter to put us at or near the top of the A-10, but of course, it is always possible Mooney starts Tyne and Tanner next year as well, ignoring the fact that we just went 5-14 A-10 with them starting this year.I shared on another thread but will say it on this thread too.
I honestly think the strategy our admin has is to give Mooney a ton of NIL next year. Wouldn’t be surprised if we’re top 2 or 3. It’ll still be cheaper than buying out his contract. The idea is to have one year where he does really well. Not necessarily making the NCAA tournament but trying to replicate the 2023-2024 season. Their hope is this can cool off the pressure they’ve gotten that’ll last for the last 2 years of his contract in which they’ll go back to paying him the middle of the A10. They won’t care about the results because at the end of those 2 years Mooney retires.
Quinn and Bigs both took a big jump in year 2 with us. We also had a senior in Dji who made a big jump that year. So, while King and Hunt were new in 2024, they came in with some talent around them. Nearly all the guys this year will be new, making it that much harder for us to be good in Mooney's outdated system. Unfortunately, I don't see us getting close to the 15-3 A-10 we saw that year, even with a lot of NIL. With a new coach, new players, and a new system, absolutely 15-3 would be possible next year.