sman
All A-10 player
ok, that's more than I expected!Verbal Commits has 321 in their database so far.
wish I knew how many were already in there before the season ended.
ok, that's more than I expected!Verbal Commits has 321 in their database so far.
Yeah, I saw that. I know we recruited him out of high school, but I don't think we actually offered?Was keeping an eye on this 7-footer from D2 UVA-Wise due to the possible Gipe connections, but he's heading to Wofford. Maybe this will piss off Cutter Sisk and bring him back our way?
How about this guy? One concern would be that he missed the Ivy and NCAA Tournaments due to a concussion he suffered in practice. His second one of the season that resulted in missed games.
looks like all of Virginia except us offered in case he wanted to stay local.Elamin? He had a final three of Utah State, VCU, and Iowa. Never saw us linked with him even though a bunch of schools were on him. I know Mason and Rhody were involved. Even Radford offered him.
Anna's brother went back up to P5 this year and had a nice year for Cal! So UDel. got him, but couldn't keep him. Of course he has been to 3 high schools from grades 9-12 and 4 colleges in 5 years, so he doesn't stick around much. Opposite of Anna really. One high school for 4 years and 4 years and graduated from Penn State before coming to us!.I saw him playing well down the stretch for them. I thought he was a senior. Looking at bio, he was listed as a senior though shows one year at providence did not play at all due to injury. Surprised they didn't list as a junior this year.
That is two guys that have transferred from Providence in the last few years and been studs at Delaware.
But wait....sman says that CANNOT happen...p5 top 150 to a mid major.....whatt?????? That is two. Plus they punked us for Anna's brother last season....another p5 transfer that fits my profile. But we shouldn't try 17. Why can bottom of the barrel Delaware keep getting these guys????
Obviously they are not getting enough, but they have got 2-4 in the last few years. If we could get those guys instead maybe moon looks quite a bit better. Oh well, we shouldn't try.
He is going to be in his mid 20's and have no lasting relationships. But yay, he played hoops at a bunch of random places.Anna's brother went back up to P5 this year and had a nice year for Cal! So UDel. got him, but couldn't keep him. Of course he has been to 3 high schools from grades 9-12 and 4 colleges in 5 years, so he doesn't stick around much. Opposite of Anna really. One high school for 4 years and 4 years and graduated from Penn State before coming to us!.
Basically all our portal guys are going to have rather large deficiencies. Neskovic, AP, Johnston, etc. all looked a lot better on paper than on the court and several of the guys already mentioned on here for this cycle are going to defend about as well as our team did this year!Lopez, Tyne, Walz, were all around 40% from 3 as well. Johnston was close too. Sometimes numbers do lie
In with competition we can compete with. The question is - - can he play at our level? Neskovic had numbers like this at a slightly higher level and he was no help.Marcus Kell - 6’8 F, 1 year left. Averaged 14 and 5 this year.
Neskovic was a great scorer, but way too slow to play defense. If he'd been a little quicker he could have been a great all-around player.In with competition we can compete with. The question is - - can he play at our level? Neskovic had numbers like this at a slightly higher level and he was no help.
Neskovic's numbers were from pure volume, he was 5th in the country in usage rate before transferring here. His efficiency was actually really bad.In with competition we can compete with. The question is - - can he play at our level? Neskovic had numbers like this at a slightly higher level and he was no help.
Agreed. Offensive volume on very bad teams does not a player make!Neskovic's numbers were from pure volume, he was 5th in the country in usage rate before transferring here. His efficiency was actually really bad.
our 24-25 team was bad, but only Roche and the centers of the regulars had higher eFG% numbers than Dusan.Neskovic's numbers were from pure volume, he was 5th in the country in usage rate before transferring here. His efficiency was actually really bad.
But what I think hurt us was that his eFG % was about 40th in the A10…our 24-25 team was bad, but only Roche and the centers of the regulars had higher eFG% numbers than Dusan.
at 48.6% he was above Tanner, Hunt, White, Tyne, and AP.
and that was dragged down by a career worse season shooting from 3.
he was 51,5% the year before at Dartmouth and a whopping 58.1% before that.
but yeah, not strong on defense. that wasn't for a lack of effort though.