Did Elon, Furman, and Ch Southern match our investment? How about Marist, La Tech and about 5 other teams last year? Did they match? And, how come A-10 teams who spend less than us have beaten us as well? So, are you saying with the 2 million we are spending, we should just accept that we will win about 5 or 6 games in the A-10 every year? We are 9-22 in our last 31 A-10 games and also have about 10 bad OOC losses the past 2 years to teams we spend more than, some a whole lot more, and you want to use the money excuse? Sorry, not buying it. Oh, and we are 4-6 this season against A-10 teams not named SLU, Dayton, or VCU just incase we want to keep pretending they are the issue here.A part of me gets the frustration, but context matters. Coach Mooney has been here over 20 years because he’s built stability at a place that simply doesn’t have the same resources as the top of this league. Look at what’s happening across the conference — the upper-tier programs as mentioned are spending at levels that are more in line with the Big East than any "mid-major". That’s not speculation; it’s reality in the NIL era. You can’t expect a smaller school to line up financially with programs operating with power-conference money.
Could results be better? Sure they could, but acting like this is an even playing field ignores what’s actually happening in college basketball right now. Stability, competitive seasons, and staying relevant in the conference race are accomplishments when you’re not spending at the top of the market. If we want different results, it absolutely starts with matching the investment — not just swapping out the guy who’s been holding the program together for two decades.
Last edited: