We were stale years ago - we celebrated when we won the a10 tourney in DC because we had a group including Grant and Gilly that kept the team together for a chance to win. That will not happen again.
I guess we’ll just have to fundamentally agree to disagree on this. 2023-2024 was a great season. 2021-2022 had some underperformance during the season with all our super seniors but they delivered at the end of the day when it mattered most and got us an A10 championship/NCAA win. We cannot keep ignoring the good things that have happened to us and try to be dismissive of that.
I am not saying this about anyone specifically, but I feel when one doesn’t acknowledge those seasons as being very solid for us or trying to downplay them, it comes across as being a “Mooney-Hater” more than it does as someone who wants Richmond to succeed.
Simultaneous truths can exist. We had recent solid years that certainly weren’t stale, but the direction that this program is going in right now is not good at all. Schedule continues to stink, we have no solid underclassman other than Argabright to build upon, Tyne and Walz have not developed nearly as much as we’ve hoped during their times here so there’s little hope that Robinson, Harper, or McGlothin will develop to A10 caliber players. We have not done a good job with high school recruiting and our transfers, while skillful and talented in many ways, are not doing a good job competing at an A10 level offensively AND defensively. During this NIL/transfer era, we have had poor seasons 2 out of the last 3 years and if this season continues this way, will be 3 out of the last 4.
So what I would tell Hardt or PQ or anyone else of importance, if I had any influence, is that while Mooney did deliver with solid results, the new landscape of college athletics I think is one that he simply is not able to adjust to well enough for us to be competing at the level we all want to be. He has not adjusted in terms of high school recruiting, transfer recruiting, player development, and offensive/defensive schemes in my opinion. Hence my concern regarding the future direction of this program.